首页> 外文OA文献 >Continuous wound infiltration or epidural analgesia for pain prevention after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery within an enhanced recovery program (POP-UP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Continuous wound infiltration or epidural analgesia for pain prevention after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery within an enhanced recovery program (POP-UP trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:在增强的恢复程序(POP-UP试验)中,连续伤口浸润或硬膜外镇痛用于预防肝胰胆管手术后的疼痛(POP-UP试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Postoperative pain prevention is essential for the recovery of surgical patients. Continuous (thoracic) epidural analgesia (CEA) is routinely practiced for major abdominal surgery, but evidence is conflicting on its benefits in this setting. Potential disadvantages of epidural analgesia are a) perioperative hypotension, frequently requiring additional intravenous fluid boluses or prolonged use of vasopressors; b) relatively high failure rates, with periods of inadequate analgesia; and c) the risk of rare but serious, at times persistent, neurologic complications (hematoma and abscess). In recent years, continuous (subfascial) wound infiltration (CWI) plus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been suggested as a safe and reliable alternative, which does not have the previously mentioned disadvantages, but evidence from multicenter trials targeting a specific surgical population is lacking. We hypothesize that CWI+PCA is equally as effective as CEA, without the mentioned disadvantages. POP-UP is a randomized controlled noninferiority multicenter trial, recruiting adult patients scheduled for elective hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery via laparotomy in an enhanced recovery setting. A total of 102 patients are being randomly allocated to CWI+PCA or (P)CEA. Our primary endpoint is the Overall Benefit of Analgesic Score (OBAS), a composite endpoint of pain intensity, opioid-related adverse effects and patient satisfaction, during postoperative days 1 to 5. Secondary endpoints include length of the hospital stay, number of patients with severe pain, and the use of rescue medication. POP-UP is a pragmatic trial that will provide evidence of whether CWI+PCA is noninferior as compared to (P)CEA after elective hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery via laparotomy in an enhanced recovery setting. If this hypothesis is confirmed, this finding could contribute to more widespread implementation of this technique, especially when the described disadvantages of epidural analgesia are less often observed with CWI+PCA. Netherlands Trial Register NTR4948 (registry date 2 January 2015)
机译:术后疼痛的预防对于手术患者的康复至关重要。连续(胸腔)硬膜外镇痛(CEA)常规用于大型腹部手术,但在这种情况下,其益处尚有证据矛盾。硬膜外镇痛的潜在缺点是:a)围手术期低血压,经常需要额外静脉输注大剂量药物或长期使用升压药; b)相对较高的失败率,镇痛不充分的时期; c)罕见但严重,有时持续存在的神经系统并发症(血肿和脓肿)的风险。近年来,连续(筋膜下)伤口浸润(CWI)加患者自控镇痛(PCA)已被建议作为一种安全可靠的替代方案,它没有前述缺点,但是针对特定手术人群的多中心试验的证据是缺乏。我们假设CWI + PCA与CEA一样有效,而没有提及的缺点。 POP-UP是一项随机对照的非劣效性多中心试验,该研究招募了计划通过开腹手术进行选择性肝胰胰胆管手术的成年患者,以提高恢复能力。共有102位患者被随机分配到CWI + PCA或(P)CEA。我们的主要终点是术后1至5天的总镇痛评分(OBAS),疼痛强度,阿片类药物相关不良反应和患者满意度的综合终点。次要终点包括住院时间,剧烈疼痛,并使用急救药物。 POP-UP是一项务实的试验,将提供证据表明在通过增强的恢复环境通过开腹手术进行选择性肝胰胰胆管手术后,CWI + PCA是否比(P)CEA逊色。如果这一假设得到证实,则该发现可能有助于该技术的更广泛实施,尤其是当使用CWI + PCA较少观察到所描述的硬膜外镇痛的缺点时。荷兰审判注册簿NTR4948(注册日期:2015年1月2日)

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号